NASA SpecsIntact Configuration, Control and Coordinating Board Meeting (NS-CCCB)

 

View Minutes in PDF

June 16-17, 2004

Washington, DC

 

Attendees:

Bill Brodt, NASA Headquarters

Ray Schuler, NASA/Ames

Tom Hinshaw, NASA/GRC

Bela Gutman, NASA/JPL

Ron Williams, NASA/JSC

Frank Der, NASA/KSC

Lee Lillard, NASA/LaRC

Tim Stubbs, NASA/LaRC

Robert Mathis, NASA/MSFC

Ed Gobert, NASA/Stennis

Don Lilly, NASA/Wallops

Richard Hatcher, SGS

Richard Hungate, SGS

Pat Robinson, InDyne

 

Center Reports:

 

Ames       Ray Schuler

·        N 266 Facility to be constructed in FY06 will be Ames first LEED project.

·        All projects have been prepared in Metric, but are now both English & Metric.

 

Glenn       Tom Hinshaw

·        All C of F projects are using SpecsIntact

·        Bulk of the work is Maintenance ( Mechanical / Electrical )

·        Final Specifications are produced as a PDF file.

·        Specifications are redlined by A/E and edited by the clerical staff.

·        Printing costs have been drastically reduced by issuing review sets electronically.

·        Some Short Form specifications are produced for maintenance

o       Painting

o       Doors & Windows

·        All projects are in Metric

o       Designed in English and then converted to Metric.

·        There are currently no LEED projects, and none foreseen in the future.

·        Need to verify Submittals comply with UFGS requirements.

 

JPL           Bela Gutman

·        All C of F projects are using SpecsIntact

·        Specifications are created for all projects of $100k value or greater.

o       Specifications are on the drawings for lesser projects.

·        Outside Contractor’s are developing specifications for projects in the $100k - $500k range.

·        Currently  there is no feedback system with SI procedures.

·        New A/E firms are not able to properly edit  issues due to  Government/NASA language.

·        We are creating “Short” and “Brief” specification sections for local conditions.

·        All projects are done in Metric ( Converted ).

·        All items not on the drawings, such as calculations, are done in Imperial (English).

·        No LEED projects currently,  FY06 mandated to achieve Silver Rating.

·        Concerns with LEED discussion:

o       Validation & Certification of Commissioning Agents

o       Commissioning Costs

o       Availability of Specifications for LEED

o       Financial Support

o       Incorporating into project schedule ( LEED slows C of F  )

o       Existing Structures

 

JSC          Ron Williams

·        All C of F projects use SpecsIntact, in-house specifications are used for projects less than $200k.

·        No metric projects have been done since 1997.

·        Astronaut Quarantine Facility will be a FY04 LEED project.

·        No feed back process currently for specification changes

·        Creating a local web page for local specifications and projects.

 

KSC         Frank Der

·        All C of F projects use SpecsIntact

·        Local specifications have increased from 5 sections up to 36 sections.

·        Most projects are being waived for Metric use.

o       The Chief of Design sends a letter to HQ stating that Metric is not being used for each project

·        11% of our projects are done in Metric

·        Recommend the removal of the Waiver Process, no value added.

·        ETDC will be first LEED project in FY07

·        We are considering LEED for new projects.

·        UFGS discussion regarding the wholesale dropping of suffixes

o       There is an attempt to intensify the effort towards unification

·        The updated RCB Document is scheduled to be completed by the end of July (04) and submitted for approval. Estimate availability in September 

 

LaRC       Tim Stubbs

·        Previously all projects used SpecsIntact. We have a new contract with James Sverdrup allowing them to use alternative specifications.

·        NASA masters are not being used due to legal constraints without line by line editing.

·        We have 17 local sections

·        We have no Metric projects

·        We currently have no LEED projects; however future projects will be heading in that direction

·        “New Town” project ( $125-$150M) C of F will be LEED project, and probably Metric.

 

MSFC       Robert Mathis

·        We use “MasterSpec” and local “Short” sections.

·        We concur with previous issues relating to the use of the Metric system.

·        3 registered LEED projects

o       New office building used LEED as a guideline

o       Design fees did not increase due to A/E using it as a learning project.

 

Stennis    Ed Gobert

·        All projects use SpecsIntact

·        We have 24 local sections

·        5% of our projects use Metric

·        All new projects use Metric.

·        We have one project currently in the design stage that is a LEED project.

 

Wallops   Don Lilly

·        All projects use SpecsIntact except small projects

·        Local specification sections are outdated and being updated.

·        We have no Metric projects.

·        2 LEED projects are currently in the design stage.

 

Dryden   Presentation supplied (not presented at meeting) 

 

Dr. Checks - Bill Brodt / Bill East   (Updates & Suggestions)

·        Providing “ Outgoing  “ files for review

o       Add link to SpecsIntact Web Site

o       Add file to the ProjNet server

§         Currently sent to administration for download

§         In Oct/Nov Project Managers will be able to download files

·        Criteria Management System

o       Bill east provided an online NetEx meeting tour of abilities

·        Criteria Change Request  (CCR)

o       Each section will be assigned a Technical Proponent (NASA) and

a Technical Representative (SGS) in order to approve and execute changes to NASA/UFGS sections.

 

SGS Presentation -  Rick Hatcher

·        Updated Comparative Analysis  NASA/UFGS

·        SpecsIntact Gap Analysis and Editing Procedures

 

 

CSI MasterFormat 2004 Interface with SpecsIntact – Rick Hatcher 

 

New Section identification/numbering handed out at meeting

 

 

SpecsInact - Software Updates – Pat Robinson

 

 

Whole Building Design Guide and Product Data Services - Bill Brodt

 

 

ACTION ITEMS:

 

  1. Bill Brodt: Schedule VITS in September or October time frame for the Board regarding Master Format 2004, and a subsequent VITS regarding “OmniClass”,  date and time to be determined.

 

  1. Pat Robinson: Adjust Web based files for review. Do not use Zip files.

 

  1. Rick Hatcher: Assist Tim Stubbs with getting online with Dr. Checks.

 

  1. Review Federal Specification Product Standards to verify accuracy and validity of the standards relative to NASA sections.

 

  1. Rick Hatcher: Prepare proposal addressing  the unification, editing, and maintenance of UFGS sections with IDI/SGS.

 

  1. Frank Der: Provide a list of NASA personnel, who are to be designated as the “Technical Proponent” and “Technical Representative”, to Rick Hatcher.

 

  1. Rick Hatcher: Send link or file to Bill East for the Spec sections to be downloaded to the Projnet Server.

 

  1. During the review cycle of the UFGS gap analysis board members, reply with concur in Dr. Checks if they do not have comments.

 

  1. SGS:  Submit all completed Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS) gap analysis in the Criteria Change Request (CCR) System for the Technical Proponents’ review and implementation.

 

  1. SGS: Conduct an impact assessment of converting the unique NASA Master Text Specifications (48) to the new CSI Master Format 2004.